You're already using AI in your practice. This assessment tells you which parts are working, which parts need a guardrail, and which parts carry real risk — before something goes wrong.
"I'm using AI in my practice and I honestly don't know if I'm doing it right."
That's the internal monologue most practitioners won't say out loud. You use a tool to help draft a client summary, or you publish AI-assisted content, and there's a low-level discomfort you can't quite name. Not because you're doing anything overtly wrong. Because nobody gave you a framework for what "right" looks like in a clinical context.
The problem isn't that you're using AI. It's that you're using it without a classification system — without knowing which workflows carry real liability exposure and which ones are completely fine. That's not ignorance. That's just the gap nobody's filling.
This assessment fills it. You answer a focused set of questions about how you're currently using AI. Within 48 Hours, you receive a written analysis organized by risk zone, specific to your practice, written by Maria — not generated.
Minimal clinical risk. AI is functioning as an efficiency tool without touching the decision layer. Most practitioners are already in green zones they don't recognize — and that confidence matters.
Real value, real risk if unmanaged. These workflows need a human authority filter — a defined oversight step before anything reaches a client. The guardrail is often simpler than you expect.
Liability exposure, scope-of-practice risk, or clinical quality concerns. This isn't a judgment — it's a flag. Most practitioners have one or two red zone habits they've normalized. This is where the assessment earns its price.
Every AI workflow you're currently using, classified as Green, Yellow, or Red — with the reasoning behind each classification written in plain language.
A written summary of where your practice sits on the risk spectrum right now, and what that means for your clients, your credibility, and your scope of practice.
The two or three things that matter most, in order. Not a 20-point checklist — the specific adjustments that move you out of exposure and into confidence.
Your assessment is written by hand, specific to your answers. No templates. No generated output. The analysis is what you're paying for — not the framework.
Maria Castro spent 13 years as a data analyst and quality manager in enterprise technology — building system integrations, managing workflow architecture, and finding the failure points that organizations couldn't see until something broke. She was trained to find the signal in complex systems before the problem became visible.
She then became an integrative health practitioner. When AI started entering clinical spaces, she recognized the pattern immediately: practitioners adopting powerful tools without governance frameworks, the same way enterprise systems got integrated without quality management. The same failures. A different domain.
CLEARED exists because that gap needed someone who could speak both languages — practitioner and systems analyst — fluently. The Red/Yellow/Green model is a clinical quality classification system built for practitioners, by one.
The assessment you receive will be written by Maria personally, specific to your answers, delivered within 48 Hours.
You don't have to overhaul anything. You just need to know where you actually stand.
Begin Your Assessment — $97 Questions? Reach Maria at maria@getshgllc.com